• Re: Sysop count / Individual names

    From Flavio Bessa@4:801/188 to Ward Dossche on Monday, April 15, 2024 12:03:06
    On 04 Jan 2023, Ward Dossche said the following...

    12MAY19 05JUL22 12AUG22 29SEP22 12NOV22 04JAN23
    Z1 302 298 307 304 304 296
    Z2 571 528 509 493 490 493
    Z3 24 19 21 20 22 21
    Z4 18 23 21 21 21 21

    Interesting that Z4 and Z3 have the same amount of sysops. ;)

    ... I'm not a complete idiot... Several parts are missing!

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (macOS/64)
    * Origin: Saturn's Orbit BBS - Back from the ashes (4:801/188)
  • From Fernando Toledo@4:902/26 to Flavio Bessa on Monday, April 15, 2024 20:39:09
    El 15/4/24 a las 12:03, Flavio Bessa escribió:
    On 04 Jan 2023, Ward Dossche said the following...

    WD> 12MAY19 05JUL22 12AUG22 29SEP22 12NOV22 04JAN23
    WD> Z1 302 298 307 304 304 296
    WD> Z2 571 528 509 493 490 493
    WD> Z3 24 19 21 20 22 21
    WD> Z4 18 23 21 21 21 21

    Interesting that Z4 and Z3 have the same amount of sysops. ;)

    ... I'm not a complete idiot... Several parts are missing!

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (macOS/64)
    * Origin: Saturn's Orbit BBS - Back from the ashes (4:801/188)

    I think we are not more than 10

    * Zone,4,America_Latina,Argentina,Manuel_Adorni,-Unpublished-,300,CM,XA,IMI:hub@momiabbs.com.ar,IBN:momiabbs.no-ip.info

    system working, ZC dont' have activity for several months

    * Region,80,Rede_Brasil,Rio_de_Janeiro_RJ,Flavio_Bessa,-Unpublished-,300,CM,MO,IBN:fido.rbt.net.br

    This region was update by Flavio few day ago.. so i think that can seems
    to be the most up to date "segment"

    *Region,88,Chile,Chile,Patricio_Rodriguez,-Unpublished-,300,CM,IBN:mastodontbbs.hopto.org

    Just one node and completly offline for several months.

    * Host,900
    just the Vault BBS here (4:900/102), not another bbs's activity

    * Host,902
    4:902/7 Reisub BBS
    4:902/19 Fercho BBS
    4:902/25 Dock Sud BBS (Test Node, ME)
    4:902/26 Dock Sud BBS (ME)
    4:902/27 Momia BBS (ZC node)

    * Region 92, PAnama, just one host and completly offile for several months.

    the Z4 must be restructured, but ZC is not actively as you know
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: Dock Sud BBS - http://bbs.docksud.com.ar (4:902/26)
  • From Flavio Bessa@4:801/188 to Fernando Toledo on Monday, April 15, 2024 21:37:47
    On 15 Apr 2024, Fernando Toledo said the following...

    This region was update by Flavio few day ago.. so i think that can seems to be the most up to date "segment"

    Still, there is a few tidying up to be completed, I am expecting a new nodelist to be delivered tomorrow.
    In Brazil we have 10 systems effectively receiving echomail.

    Just one node and completly offline for several months.

    Patricio promised he would be back online this week. Let's see.

    * Host,900
    just the Vault BBS here (4:900/102), not another bbs's activity

    There is Gaston (4:900/108) and Arturo (4:900/107), at least Arturo activated links with me to receive the BR.* echoes directly.
    Also Thierry (4:900/106) comes on and off as a private system.


    * Region 92, PAnama, just one host and completly offile for several months.

    Yes, this is a dead end. I asked the region to be removed...

    the Z4 must be restructured, but ZC is not actively as you know

    At the end, I don't see the need to have two hosts for Argentina, the numbers simply do not match. Both hosts could be consolidated under 4:900, what do you think?

    ... There are three kinds of people: Those who can count, and those who can't

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (macOS/64)
    * Origin: Saturn's Orbit BBS - Back from the ashes (4:801/188)
  • From Carlos Navarro@2:341/234.1 to Flavio Bessa on Tuesday, April 23, 2024 16:20:19
    15 Apr 2024 21:37, you wrote to Fernando Toledo:

    At the end, I don't see the need to have two hosts for Argentina,
    the numbers simply do not match. Both hosts could be consolidated
    under 4:900, what do you think?

    Is this remedy not worse than the disease?

    And why not consolidate under 4:902 instead?

    Carlos

    --- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: cyberiada (2:341/234.1)
  • From Ward Dossche@2:292/854 to Carlos Navarro on Tuesday, April 23, 2024 18:09:08
    And why not consolidate under 4:902 instead?

    Unless our Z4-brethren do not deal with the currently existing situation, what's the point in even discussing it?

    \%/@rd

    --- DB4 - 20230201
    * Origin: -o=O=o- International Coordinator -o=O=o- (2:292/854)
  • From Flavio Bessa@4:801/188 to Carlos Navarro on Friday, May 10, 2024 13:37:43
    On 23 Apr 2024, Carlos Navarro said the following...

    Is this remedy not worse than the disease?

    And why not consolidate under 4:902 instead?

    It does not make much sense since the amount of nodes do not justify different Hubs. Back in R80 we did consolidate everyone under Host 801 a few years ago and it was for the best.

    ... A SQL query walks into a bar and sees two tables. Asks: 'Can I join you?'

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A48 (macOS/64)
    * Origin: Saturn's Orbit BBS - Back from the ashes (4:801/188)