º There *really* needs to be a maximum age to run for office. I'd setI would require a rule of Age 80. You can not run for president if your
º the federal retirement age.
4 years will make you 80 years old. So if you are 74 you can run for 1 term, but not 2.
In this instance, I am not sure if Joe and Kamala sent them. It DW>> sound like the mayor is convinced that some companies are behind
All this money for these people and not ONE DIME for homeless Vets.
I love my country, but I hate my current goverment. At least Trump
gave a shit.
Trump called U.S. Marines who died at Belleau Wood "suckers" and U.S. soldiers buried at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery "losers" in a speech during a visit to France in 2018. Doesn't really sound like someone who gives a shit to me.
they do have programs and housing for homeless vets.
when i lived in milwaukee there were several places.
they also had a dorm where you could live if you were low income.
In some places, vets and old people are (supposedly!) being kicked
out in favor of illegal immigrants because the owners of the
facilities can get more money from the government for taking in
immigrants vs. assisting the other groups.
"Supposedly" is pulling a lot of weight there. Citation needed.
halian wrote to KnightMare <=-
In this instance, I am not sure if Joe and Kamala sent them. It sound like the mayor is convinced that some companies are behind it that ar receiving FEMA money for relocating them. Now, did Kamala brag about getting Temporary Protective Status for these Haitian immigrants? Yes FEMA handing out the money as a part of their administration? Yes.
All this money for these people and not ONE DIME for homeless Vets.
I love my country, but I hate my current goverment. At least Trump
gave a shit.
Trump called U.S. Marines who died at Belleau Wood "suckers" and U.S. soldiers buried at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery "losers" in a speech during a visit to France in 2018. Doesn't really sound like someone who gives a shit to me.
"Supposedly" is pulling a lot of weight there. Citation needed.
What? you don't have Google?
Citation needed is a way of saying "I'm to lazy to look it up, you do the work for me".
"Supposedly" is pulling a lot of weight there. Citation needed.
What? you don't have Google?
Citation needed is a way of saying "I'm to lazy to look it up, you
do the work for me".
That argument also sounds like a way of saying "I'm too lazy to provide a link to back up what I'm saying; you look it up."
In some places, vets and old people are (supposedly!) being kicked out in favor of illegal immigrants because the owners of the facilities can get more money from the government for taking in immigrants vs. assisting the other groups.
"Supposedly" is pulling a lot of weight there. Citation needed.
Trump called U.S. Marines who died at Belleau Wood "suckers" and U.S. soldiers >buried at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery "losers" in a speech during a visit to >France in 2018. Doesn't really sound like someone who gives a shit to me.
Dumas Walker wrote to HALIAN <=-
Trump called U.S. Marines who died at Belleau Wood "suckers" and U.S. soldiers
buried at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery "losers" in a speech during a visit to
France in 2018. Doesn't really sound like someone who gives a shit to me.
Since you asked me for citations on this thread, here is a citation
that you might want to check out.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/10/04/donald-trump-call-troops-suckers- losers/
"In sum, the claim stemmed from a story by The Atlantic, which relied
on anonymous, second-hand reports of Trump's alleged words; there was
no independent footage or documented proof to substantiate the
in-question comments; and Trump vehemently denies that he once called service members 'losers' and 'suckers.' While it was certainly possible that he said those things, Snopes was unable to independently verify
the claim.
So, in short, you are basing your claims on a story that relied on anonymous, second-hand reports and no documented proof.
Trump called U.S. Marines who died at Belleau Wood "suckers" and U.S. sol >buried at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery "losers" in a speech during a vis >France in 2018. Doesn't really sound like someone who gives a shit to me.
Since you asked me for citations on this thread, here is a citation that you might want to check out.
https://www.snopes.com/news/2023/10/04/donald-trump-call-troops-suckers-lo
because they are false.
What? you don't have Google?
Citation needed is a way of saying "I'm to lazy to look it up, you do the for me".
When you cherry-pick some comments/actions/inactions, you can say that about any politician you want to. It's all a matter of context, and which "side" you're on. Let me know if you need a list of gaffs/slights produced by the current administration on this subject.
liberal
koolaid-slurpers
It's a joke - they don't want to speak the truth... they just don't want T over any reality.
because they are false.
[citation needed]
What? you don't have Google?
Citation needed is a way of saying "I'm to lazy to look it up, you
do the for me".
You made the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.
Trump called U.S. Marines who died at Belleau Wood "suckers" and U.S. soldiers buried at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery "losers" in a speech during a visit to France in 2018. Doesn't really sound like someone who
Citation needed is a way of saying "I'm to lazy to look it up, you do the work for me".
Re: Trump Harris debate
By: Denn to halian on Sun Sep 29 2024 08:22 am
No - it means you made the claim, now back it up.
Don't talk about something you have no proof of. i'm not doing your
dirty work.
It's you (the claimnant) who is lazy.
Yhe onus is on you.
Re: Trump Harris debateNo need for citation anyway, Dumas Walker and paulie420 already provided sources.
By: Denn to halian on Sun Sep 29 2024 08:22 am
No - it means you made the claim, now back it up.
Don't talk about something you have no proof of. i'm not doing your
dirty work.
It's you (the claimnant) who is lazy.
Yhe onus is on you.
---
It's a joke - they don't want to speak the truth... they just don't
want T over any reality.
Trump is a reality fundamentally incompatible with truth.
Trump called U.S. Marines who died at Belleau Wood "suckers" and U.S. sol >DW> >buried at Aisne-Marne American Cemetery "losers" in a speech during a vis >DW> >France in 2018. Doesn't really sound like someone who gives a shit to me.
Since you asked me for citations on this thread, here is a citation that you might want to check out.
Its so stupid that we're still talking about [ALL of these BS Trump misquotes]
this.
Not attacking you, Dumas
- but the other side would attack us, blast us on the
main media news for weeks at a time and make sure the world knew.
It's a joke - they don't want to speak the truth... they just don't want Trump >over any reality.
It's a joke - they don't want to speak the truth... they just don't w over any reality.
Trump is a reality fundamentally incompatible with truth.
Trump is not always perfect in what he says for sure but it would be nice if the press didn't misquote, or fail to fully quote, our Presidents and Presidential candidates. Let us hear/read all they said and then let us decide if we like it or not. Instead the press try to lead us to a decision they want.
Some of the same things are happening with Harris. The other day FOX
News posted something to YT that was about another "Harris word salad." It was pretty obviously heavily edited and, despite that (and despite
the fact that I didn't agree with her!), her words were not nonsense as FOX News would want us to believe.
There are sure some members of the press, and a lot of voters, who aren't so much leaning towards Harris (and Biden before her) as they are away from Trump.
We don't have a Walter Cronkite (The most
trusted man in America) anymore; a 'politcally neutral reporter'.. until 1968 when he made his views on the Vietnam War known, he was a stallward in reporting... - nor do we have a Howard K. Smith, David Brinkley or even Eric Sevareid. Only until their latter years did these reporters show their affiliations - these are reporters that we would all benefit from today in 2024; but it won't happen.
There are sure some members of the press, and a lot of voters, who aren't
so much leaning towards Harris (and Biden before her) as they are away from Trump.
I hope we all vote, Dumas - I'm certainly going to.
(I'm in Oregon - so.. please, YOU VOTE. :P)
What? you don't have Google?
Citation needed is a way of saying "I'm to lazy to look it up, you do the
for me".
You made the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.
That argument also sounds like a way of saying "I'm too lazy to provide a link to back up what I'm saying; you look it up."
Nightfox
That argument also sounds like a way of saying "I'm too lazy to provide a
link to back up what I'm saying; you look it up."
That is because I have discovered reposting the same information once and again and again becomes tedious after a while.
I am not talking
specifically about this discussion, but geeze, there are some subjects that are both common knowledge and docummented, and when you bring them up somebody asks for a source.
I'm not talking about things that are common knowlege. I've often seen people post things regarding information that isn't well known, and then offer nothing to back it up, which is why people ask for a source.
Or, alternately, people mention something as an argument to something else, but the information seems dubious, yet they don't provide a source.
That is because I have discovered reposting the same information once and agai[...]
and again becomes tedious after a while. I am not talking specifically about this discussion, but geeze, there are some subjects that are both common knowledge and docummented, and when you bring them up somebody asks for a source.
A week later a different person does the same thing regarding the same topic. Multiply it three more times and then it becomes obvious asking for certain sources of information is a dishonest practice and nobody should be playing ball.
Myself, I think that's far too old. (For context, I thought there was one federal retirement age, but no, the federal employee benefit plan makes it much more complicated than that. The oldest immediate retirement age under that plan is 62 with five years of service.)
When you cherry-pick some comments/actions/inactions, you can say that about any politician you want to. It's all a matter of context, andmany of these accusations are cherry picked to defame trump such as the
which "side" you're on. Let me know if you need a list of gaffs/slights produced by the current administration on this subject.
Matthew Munson wrote to GAMGEE <=-
When you cherry-pick some comments/actions/inactions, you can say that about any politician you want to. It's all a matter of context, and
which "side" you're on. Let me know if you need a list of gaffs/slights produced by the current administration on this subject.
many of these accusations are cherry picked to defame trump such as the dead solider from texas where the sister of the one died said the
atlantic magazine writer lied big time.
| Sysop: | Luis Silva |
|---|---|
| Location: | Lisbon |
| Users: | 763 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 12:21:54 |
| Calls: | 247 |
| Files: | 46,971 |
| Messages: | 11,916 |